1. Analyzing MN SoS data for potential problems:
   • Voters that may have voted more than once
   • Voters who are deceased and yet cast a ballot
   • Abnormal number of votes from a particular address
   • Voters registered who have no permanent address or an invalid one
   • Voters who may not be able to legally cast a vote (felons, mentally incompetent, etc.)
   • Students who may have voted at home and at school
   • Lack of voter history information or other incomplete voter information for absentee or in-person voters.

        2. Reviewing the voting technology used in various counties for:

• • • Vulnerabilities
    • Known issues – as identified in other states – or simply with the technology itself (ie Windows 7 security)
    • Improper security procedures, election procedures or certification procedures (or lack thereof)
    • Consistency with State law/rules/certification criteria.
    • If we believe there is an error in the machine totals, request forensic audits be performed.

          3. Performing a county-by-county analysis to identify the most problematic counties 

• • Where increased Election Judge resources may be warranted
  • Early voting Ballot boards may need review/attention
  • Procedures are suspect.

          4. Provide evidence of potential errors in certain areas so that other sub-committees can take further action:

• • Recommendations on potential lawsuits
  • Recommendations on where to focus on Ballot Boards and Election Judges
  • Recommendations on where legislation could use updating/refining
  • Evidence worthy of a Press Release